James Henry Fetzer: 9/11 Was Created by CIA, Neo-Cons

"9

"We have massive proof that the Twin Towers were blown apart and did not collapse, which appears to have been done using a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes. It was not even possible that It could have collapsed, given its design and construction. WTC-7 came down in a classic controlled demolition. All four of the airplane "crash sites" were faked or fabricated, albeit each in its own way. None of them actually crashed, which means that no passengers abroad died in crashes. And no "suicide hijackers" were aboard them to cause them to crash, which means that the whole "War on Terror" was based on a false premise. 9

James Henry Fetzer is an American philosopher of science and conspiracy theorist. He is an editor at Veterans Today and co-founder of Scholars for 9

What follows is the full text of the interview:

Q: As you know 9/11 conspiracy theories attribute the planning and executions of the September 11 attacks to certain parties or claim there was an advance knowledge of the attacks among high-level government officials. Possible motives claimed by conspiracy theorists of such actions include justifying the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq as well as geostrategic interests in the Middle-East. What’s your take on that?

A: To understand 9

The master plan was to draw the United States into endless wars in the Middle East on behalf of Israel, where no American interests were at stake. In the past, the stability of the region was viewed as paramount to guarantee the uninterrupted flow of oil from stable but despotic regimes. Indeed, no rational soul today would claim that Iraq, for example, is better off now than it was under Saddam Hussein, whose blunder may have been to abandon the petro-dollar. Gaining a foothold for international bankers in a region dominated by Islam, which tends to eschew usury, was another powerful motive.

Q: As we approach the 13th anniversary of the September 11th attacks, there still exists an almost complete blackout in mainstream media of the voluminous forensic evidence that demands an immediate and independent new investigation of that determining day. If the American people were to demand a new investigation into the 9/11, a common criticism would be that the government is not very good at investigating itself and when it does so, historically it usually either absolves itself of any alleged crimes or finds convenient scapegoats in the form of either patsies or CIA sponsored boogeymen. What in your mind would be required for a new investigation to be successful and to actually lead to some type of reform of the system?

A: The desire for a "new investigation" of 9

We have massive proof that the Twin Towers were blown apart and did not collapse, which appears to have been done using a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes. It was not even possible that it could have collapsed, given its design and construction. WTC-7 came down in a classic controlled demolition. All four of the airplane "crash sites" were faked or fabricated, albeit each in its own way. None of them actually crashed, which means that no passengers aboard died in crashes. And no "suicide hijackers" were aboard them to cause them to crash, which means that the whole "War on Terror" was based on a false premise. 9

Q: The US authorities described the event as coordinated terrorist attacks launched by Al-Qaeda and later claimed that Osama Bin Laden was the mastermind behind the attacks. Then American intelligence forces purportedly carried out a mission codenamed “Operation Neptune Spear” which led to Osama’s death. What do you think? Who did really orchestrate the 9/11?

A: 9

The changes in US foreign policy were complemented by subversion of the Constitution in implementing the misnamed PATRIOT Act, which has profoundly altered American society into a surveillance state in which freedom of speech and of expression has been severely constrained. History will record its gross misadventure into the Middle East as the last dying gasps of an empire that has depleted its military and expended its treasury for an unattainable goal, leaving an enormous swath of death and devastation in its wake. The situation was more promising, but nothing good for human beings is about to emerge.

Osama bin Laden had nothing to do with 9

Q: Do you believe there is a connection between 9/11 attacks and appearance of the so-called Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL)? Is ISIL an offshoot of the 9/11?

A: The ISIL phenomenon, which includes fake beheadings of journalist with real destruction of religious icons, has been astonishing in its apparent rapidity. Recent reports that its leader is an agent of the Mossad are illuminating, since, given the Assad government's success in routing the rebels there, suggests that the forces who want to create instability in the region by removing secular leaders and allowing ancient and deep faith-based antagonisms to reassert themselves can only work to the benefit of Israel. New claims from the American government (that it might take three years to suppress ISIL) hint that we are being taken for a ride to create an excuse to use NATO forces to depose Assad and perform other mischief there.

So this appears to be one more ruse to destabilize the Middle East for the benefit of Israel. It is stunning how much terror and destruction has been wrong by that small state and its advocates, going back to the bombing of the King David Hotel in 1946 by Irgun terrorists dressed as Arabs, the air attack on the USS Liberty, the false flags on the Israeli Embassy and the Jewish Community Center in Buenos Aires in 1972 and 1974, and even attempts to blame the Palestinians for the atrocities of 9

Interview by Javad Arab Shirazi